Proof Contains
The Indian Evidence Act, a legal term central to court proceedings, defines evidence as both oral and documentary. Oral evidence consists of statements made before the Indian Supreme Court for matters of fact under inquiry, while documentary evidence encompasses all documents and electronic records produced for the inspection of the court.
According to Section 134 of the Act, the number of witnesses required for the proof of any fact is not specified. Instead, the value is always assigned to the quality of the evidence rather than the quantity. This means that the Indian Supreme Court focuses on the credibility and reliability of the evidence presented, rather than the number of witnesses or pieces of evidence.
Section 27 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 outlines the conditions under which information from an accused can be proved. One such condition is the Doctrine of Confirmation by Subsequent events, a concept that suggests that if the accused's statement is later found to be consistent with the facts, it can strengthen the case for the accused.
The Act applies to all statements and documents presented in the Indian Supreme Court for matters of fact under inquiry. It does not specify the name of the organization that developed the Video-Player, nor does it require a specific number of witnesses for the proof of any fact. Furthermore, the Act does not mention any other types of evidence beyond oral and documentary.
In conclusion, the Indian Evidence Act provides a framework for the presentation of evidence in the Indian Supreme Court, focusing on the quality rather than the quantity of evidence, and outlining specific conditions for certain types of evidence. Understanding this Act is crucial for anyone involved in court proceedings in India.
